Showing posts with label weird comics history. Show all posts
Showing posts with label weird comics history. Show all posts

Tuesday, May 17, 2022

Weird Comics History - Cable Eats a Bagel

 

Weird Comics History - Cable Eats a Bagel

Or... the de-Imagification of Nathan Dayspring Askani'son Summers

Should I start this piece by doing that sarky internet writer thing, by reminding you all that it's been thirty years since Image Comics launched? Ya know, to remind us all how dreadfully oooooooold we are? Nah, I won't put'cha through that...

Actually, rather than talk at all about the launch of Image Comics... which, I've already done... several times, and if I'm being completely honest -- I'm kinda "over" it, I want to discuss how the original "Image attitude" kinda fell out of the comics zeitgeist during the latter half of the decade, and in particular, the surprising "de-Imagification" of a character who I never thought I'd enjoy reading about.

If you're more interested in partying like it's 1992... well: pouches, advantageous, shoulder pads, no-feet. Cool? Cool.

For my bit, we're gonna hop to the other end of the decade. It's 1998, and I was newly back into the comics hobby after... a little while away. I've told this story before, though I'm not sure if I've ever actually written about it. Assuming I have (I do write and talk a lot), I'll spare you the deep dive and just share the quick 'n dirty of it. Basically, I found myself fed up with the gimmicks. I clearly had more sense at 15 than I do today, because back then I actually did walk away. For a bit. It was the week that X-Men (vol.2) #45 hit the shelves... and, as I did every month, I hobbled my way down to the comic shop with a couple'a bucks in my pocket to pick up my latest fix. Upon arrival, I was intensely annoyed that... rather than being a regular-sized/regular-covered $1.99 "X-Men Deluxe" issue... it was a $3.95 cardstock-n-foil gimmick cover issue -- one which I didn't have near enough repurposed lunch money to leave the store with! I asked the owner why this was a "special issue", as it wasn't a "divisible by 25" issue -- turns out, it was the 20th anniversary of Giant-Size... and, boy, it was like a veil was lifted.

I realized that, any given month... Marvel could decide to celebrate, ya know, anything -- and tart up and double the cost of our monthlies. See? I definitely had more sense back then. I put the ish back on the shelf -- proclaimed to anybody who'd listen that I was "done" with the hobby. I was leaving... and never coming back. The shop owner, Bob Nastasi of Amazing Comics in Sayville, New York assured me that I'd be back -- and that we always come back. Damned if he wasn't right.

A cross-country move, and the realization that I wasn't the most personable young fellow in the world, led me back to my comics comfort food. This move, ironically enough, almost resulted in me leaving my two longbox collection of comics behind! I thought I was done with 'em... and that phase in my life was over. I actually only took 'em with me as an afterthought... there just happened to be room on the truck!

This was mid-1997, and while I was enjoying revisiting the comics I had... ones I'd already read, seemingly dozens of times before already -- I wasn't quite prepared to venture into the wilds of my new stomping grounds in order to add to my collection. I still thought I was done. I figured that the industry would still be using the same gimmicks that ran me outta dodge in the first place... after all, it had only been a couple of years. This changed when I went to a nearby mall in order to apply for a job in every single store within it. There was a comic shop there... and, as I was already there to hand in an application... I decided to have a goo at the current offerings on the shelves. Picked up some X-Stuff... and, though it wasn't part of the "plan" -- I was back.

Not only was I back... but, I was completely back. Anyone who has the misfortune of knowing me, will know that I'm very much an "all or nothing" kinda idjit. If I'm in for one X-Book... then, dammit, I'm in for them all. Especially considering, this was around the time I became more active on USENET. When I first saw things like Paul O'Brien's X-Axis -- and sites like X-Fan being linked to. In seeing Paul's work, impressionable goof that I was, I found myself inspired... and decided that I wanted to do what he did. I wanted to share my thoughts on comics... though, likely in a far less enlightened and intelligent sort of way. Then as now, I wanted to be viewed as someone who had something worthwhile to say about the things I was passionate about. In order to do that (which, I never actually did -- even though I'm sure I was a far better writer back in the long ago than I am now), I'd definitely have to buy 'em all!

Now, the one book out of the entire X-Family of books circa 1997 that I was absolutely dreading having to buy, read, and think up clever things to say about was... Cable. In retrospect, that's saying something... since X-Men Unlimited, Howard Mackie's X-Factor, and Larry Hama's "pookafied" Generation X were still very much things. Cable to me was a relic, even in ye old 1997. He was the embodiment (or harbinger of) the Image Comics archetype. Big guns, shadowy past, constantly gritted teeth, nonsense "tough guy" talk, the whole thing. I held off on "committing" to Cable for as long as I could... mostly because, when I came back, his book was in the middle of a (then-rare) six-issue story arc, which I had no interest in jumping in on during its third or fourth chapter. At least that's what I told myself... I didn't seem to have any problem starting in the middle-issues of some of the other X-Books.

Cable, and by extension Image Comics, was emblematic to me of the ridiculous 90s comics excess that drove me outta the hobby to begin with. In hindsight, that might be an unfair conflation -- as Marvel was certainly no slouch when it came to "excess" (or x-cess, as the case may be). Perhaps, as I was just rediscovering my love of comics again, I wasn't quite ready to be reminded of all that? To me, I simply had to resign myself to the fact that... if I was going to go all-in, Cable was very much going to be a part of deal. Kind of a "You take the good, you take the bad..." situation.

And so I braced myself... and picked up my first issue of Cable since the series was in the single-digits, Cable #55 (June, 1998). I almost didn't... as, not only did this issue's cover prominently feature our man Nate... but also, Domino. Another "relic" from a time I didn't wanna revisit. Then... I sat down with the issue, which prompted a bit of an eyebrow raise. First off, the art in this book, by the... do we call him "underrated" (?), Jose Ladronn... wasn't like anything I'd seen on a "current-year" book -- especially not something out of Marvel and the X-Office. It was something of a modern take on classic Kirby... something that probably shouldn't have worked... and yet, did! The writer, Joe Casey, was another new name for me. Frankly, at this point in my collecting "career", most names would'a been. If you weren't one of the Image guys, the Pinis, Stan Lee, or Scott Lobdell, I wouldn't have a clue!

The title of this issue is "Wiser Times", and it couldn't be more appropriate... at least to the young Chris who was reading it. This was a Cable who, while still gristled... still battle-hardened -- felt more like a man who was learning from his future-past than being distilled down and defined by it. So many, if not all, of the early Cable stories were predicated on the fact that he was a mysterious man from the future... rather than being a character, Cable was a collection of mysteries given four-color flesh. And, ya know... great big guns. He was the archetypal early 90s (anti)hero. The more we seemed to learn about him... the less we actually knew. For every answer we got... five new questions sprang up. Add to that how "continuity copping" was becoming far less strict, and what we're left with is a recipe for disinterest.

Joe Casey came onto the title during the middle of that aforementioned six-issue arc, Hellfire Hunt. Between that and "Wiser Times" was a one-off in Wakanda with T'Challa. Straightforward and generic superheroics wherein Cable felt more like a placeholder than anything. The heroes teamed up to beat up Klaw... which, I feel like was the only thing anybody ever did when they hooked up with the Black Panther back then. It was with Wiser Times that Casey was able to try and give our Nate as fresh a start as possible.

Late in the James Robinson run on the title (which proceeded Casey), a character named Irene Merryweather was introduced. Irene was a reporter who would wind up traveling with Cable... acting as his chronicler and biographer. This addition gave me (and I'm sure at least a couple'a other readers) hope that... maybe we were working toward a "definitive" understanding of Cable. Not the soldier, not the messiah-figure, not the dude with the pointy-headed doppelganger... but Cable the man. Surely we're all affected by our life experiences in a multitude of ways. There's a lot to that nurture element that PSY101 students love to spend entire class periods debating. However, with this new addition to Cable's cast -- we may start taking those experiences and paying them forward... rather than stagnating within them.

Cable #55 was an issue that, when I was done reading it, I was kind of left flabbergasted (it doesn't take much). It wasn't at all what I expected from a Cable book. Judging from comments around USENET at the time, I wasn't alone. This issue was met with, ya know, mixed reviews. Some people (like me) loved it, and considered it a tremendous improvement on what had come before. Others, well... not so much. Here's a smattering of takes from the long ago:

We range from "It's a great read" to "Not Recommended". Good or bad, people are talking about it. And, after a couple thousand words of pre-ramble, maybe I ought to as well... in brief.

The issue is kind of a sandwich of the stuff you'd sorta-kinda expect on either end of the stuff you wouldn't. It's quite well done, and a fun way to set the tone for what the Casey/Ladronn Cable was going to be. It's the fluffy middle section of the book that I want to focus on. It'll be these (and subsequent) "fluffy" bits that the rest of this piece will be focusing on. Cable is now operating out of Daredevil's backyard, Hell's Kitchen... and stops in the Babel Diner for both a bite to eat and a respite from the rain. Speaking of DD, Matt Murdock's actually here grabbing a bite himself... but, our hero doesn't even acknowledge him.

Cable plops down at a booth... and, spends an entire page drinking a cup of coffee. This is the kind of page that has been used-to-abuse in the time since, but, back in 1998 -- it was kind of a novelty.

Cable #55 - (w) Joe Casey / (a) Jose Ladronn

This was my first indication that, this wasn't necessarily going to be the Cable I grew up with. This wasn't the early 90s Image Comics archetype. The pages that followed were equally bizarre... yet engaging. Cable and the waitress-soon-to-be-love-interest, Stacey Kramer share a little bit of small talk. Not through "lol, gritted teeth"... not staring down the barrel of a Mark-69 Liefeldian firearm... but, over a cuppa and (eventually) a bagel.

It's not often that Cable comes across as an actual human being. Used to be that scenes like this were few and far between... and when they would occur, they would be so tempered by angst and mystery that the conversation was rendered secondary (or tertiary). Here... it's small talk. Our hero still feels like Cable... but, some of the "Nate" is slipping in as well.

While these quiet scenes may define the Casey run for me, there is so much more to it. For those unaware, the X-Offices had been building to an epic confrontation between Cable and Apocalypse for... ever. It was earmarked for the turn of the century, and it was to be the battle to end all battles. "Was to be". Joe Casey would drop hints to this eventual clash throughout his run. While bebopping around the Marvel Universe having adventures with (and against) S.H.I.E.L.D., the dude who would become the M-Tech Deathlok, the Avengers, and... a crossover with X-Man that we don't need to talk about, there would be reminders that Cable's got a date with destiny on the millennial horizon.

Our man would battle the Harbinger of Apocalypse (a human jammed in a weird coffin by Poccy that had been infused with some sort of Celestial tech a century earlier)... he would prepare for the big dance by arming himself with, of all things, a traditional Askani spear called the Psimitar. Cable without great big guns? What gives, right? While we're at it... Cable was also without his Psi-Powers for a bit here, after the events of the Psi-War over in the flagship books... a story whose ramifications were forgotten about almost immediately after it ended!

Cable discovers the Psimitar
Cable #58 - (w) Joe Casey / (a) Ed McGuinness

All throughout these adventures, Cable would find himself returning to the Babel Diner... where he'd chat up and lay his troubles on Stacey. Their friendship would become a more romantic relationship... one that both grounded our hero as a much more relatable fellow... while at the same time, reminding us that he's not. Stacey wasn't the only member of the Kramer family to join Cable's cast of characters -- her younger brother, Kenny would also appear from time to time. Kenny had Down Syndrome... which Stacey hoped Cable might be able to use his "mind powers"... to cure!

Cable #64 - (w) Joe Casey / (a) Jose Ladronn

This is a powerful scene. Stacey, who was established early on as working on her nursing degree, is desperate see her brother living a "normal life". Hoping Cable's nebulous "mind powers" might do the trick... while choosing to ignore the common sense or ethics of the situation. Even more interesting, this scene occurs during the brief time where Cable no longer had those nebulous "mind powers", so we never find out whether or not he'd have given it a try. Later on in the issue, he attempts to explain this to Stacey -- but, a) she's not interested in hearing his excuse, and b) they happen across a dying Santa Claus laying in an alley (it's Christmastime). Even this Santa scene is important, as it shows that -- even without powers (and big ol' guns), Cable's first instinct is to act the hero.

These Christmastime scenes are scattered throughout Cable #64... fitting neatly between pages out of Irene Merryweather's Cable Chronicle Biography. In it, we see where he's come from... where he's been... along with plenty of the how's and why's of his current mission, and a reminder of his pressing date with Apocalypse. It always comes back to Apocalypse. Who else is getting all psyched up for this final battle?!

Well, readers of Cable's solo book weren't the only ones getting jazzed about seeing Nate and En Sabah slappin' meat -- because, the epic barnburner of a final battle... sorta-kinda... get usurped by the X-Offices to payoff the long danglin' and lingerin' Twelve storyline. Rather than allow Casey's build and prep to pay off in dramatic fashion... the X-Offices did what they do best. The story Cable had been building toward since forever, was taken away... and handed off to:

Oh dear.

In the two years that led up to this barnburner of an issue, the readers really got to know Nathan Summers. We saw him grounded in a more mundane setting, surrounded by a non-mutant cast of characters who he'd formed bonds at attachments to. Cable, as a series, for the first time ever, had a reason to exist (creatively). The payoff? Marvel ditches the direction, brings back the "classic" look and feel -- and delivers us an issue that was so tragic and pointless, that to this very day, I'm fairly certain nobody's accepted the credit or blame for writing the thing!

The quick of it is... the issue opens with Cable strapped to a great big "X" while Apocalypse talks at him... then, 750 pages later, it ends with... Cable strapped to a great big "X" while Apocalypse talks at him. During the middle of the issue, our man breaks free... spends most of his time fighting off Wolverine (who was then the Horseman Death) -- before the big showdown. The blowoff is a handful of full-page pinup spreads of Cable and Apocalypse bouncing off each other.

A terrible issue. Though, it's hard to even blame anybody involved in it for the let down! The event that this series had been building to for years was relegated into being just "Part Two" of the wider X-Men The Twelve storyline. The story couldn't be anything more than what it was. A circular, pointless disappointment. More important than all that, around the time of this issue's production, Rob Liefeld did suffer the loss of his father.

All that having been said... I feel that the impact of Casey and Ladronn's time on the title cannot (and should not) be understated. Joe Casey took a character who was basically deep-fried and pickled 1991... and made him "matured him" for a post-2000 audience. Ironically enough, writing the sort of stories that Image Comics themselves would be putting out not too long after!

--

For more Image-centric chatter both from back in the long ago to today -- please check out the rest of the #SBTU crew!

Between The Pages Blog
Killer Walking Dead Cakes
https://www.betweenthepagesblog.com/2022/05/killer-walking-dead-cakes.html

Comics, Comics, Blog: 
Image Comics: Remembering my early days
https://comicscomicscomics.blog/?p=1845

In My Not So Humble Opinion
Astro City: That Was Then…

Jesse Starcher - Source Material
Darker Image!!!
https://www.spreaker.com/episode/49802624

Asterisk 51
Better Late Than Never: Spawn #1
https://asterisk51.blogspot.com/2022/05/better-late-than-never-spawn-1.html

Superhero Satellite
Dawn Of Image: Inking The Deal, The Dave Olbrich Tapes
https://charltonhero.wordpress.com/2022/05/18/super-blog-team-up-image-comics-the-road-to-revolution-shs-episode-3/

Comic Stripped
Term Life
https://t.co/i2jS0h6oyS

Dave's Comics Heroes Blog
Big Bang Comics
https://davescomicheroes.blogspot.com/2022/05/images-big-bang-comics.html

Chris is on Infinite Earths
Cable Eats a Bagel: the de-imagification of Nathan Dayspring Askani’Son Summers
https://www.chrisisoninfiniteearths.com/?p=37220 - You're already here!

Saturday, May 7, 2022

Weird Comics History - The Anatomy of a Slap

Weird Comics History
Avengers #213:That time Hank Pym did that thing he did...

Dusting off the Weird Comics History branding again, in order to address one of the inadvertent "seminal moments" in Marvel History... and, also to sorta kinda "pick a bone" regarding comic book "shorthand"... how a character can be defined by one action, to the point where it becomes the only thing a casual (or non) reader knows about that character.

I've talked before about how nobody can write a Speedy story without mentioning that... he was a heroin addict. How that one story line, from a half-century ago, is still all anybody wants to write about. Every Speedy story since is predicated in the fact that, Green Arrow's ward was... a junkie! Roy a father? Well yeah, but he's a junkie father! Roy started a new career? I wonder what'll happen when his bosses find out he's... a junkie! Ya know, stuff like that. Hell, the DC Universe has been rebooted, what... a half-dozen times since O'Neil/Adams' Hard-Traveling Heroes run? And yet, poor Roy Harper has been forever branded.

Roy ain't the fella I'm wanting to talk about, however. As you can see by the title of this piece, we're going to be discussing the Slap that forever branded Hank Pym... a Wife-Beater! Now, it should go without saying, but this is the internet, so I'll say it anyway -- nothing about this piece is intended as a "defense", excusing, or making light of Pym's actions/behaviors. Domestic abuse isn't anything to joke about. As part of my Masters coursework, I worked on/with several cases of it... and, if you're a victim of it, it's the sort of life I couldn't begin to wrap my head around.

This topic came to mind while I was digging through a back-issue bin at a shop early last week. This isn't a shop I frequent, as... it just doesn't have a great vibe. But, you know me when it comes to conducting an "exhaustive" search of the bins when I've got something on my "gotta find" list. Anyway, while I was there, there were two or three dudes chatting up the owner. Since this is a comic book store, they were naturally talking about comic book... movies. Kill me.

After round-tabling over how old Professor X looks, they shifted the subject over to Ant Man. One of them mentioned how they wished the film was more about "the other Ant Man"... ya know, the one who "got drunk and beat his wife all the time". The owner didn't correct him -- then again, this is a fella who I've heard tell multiple customers (myself included) that he's "too rich" and "too busy" to read comic books... so, I suppose it makes sense for him not to say anything.

Now I... almost said something. I really wanted to ask this fella if he'd ever read those Pym stories... and, if so, maybe give 'em another look. But, a) nobody likes the "ackshully guy", and b) I really didn't want to be part of this conversation... so, I didn't say anything. I mean, it's not this dude's fault that this is all he knows about Hank Pym -- because it's the only thing anybody ever really seems to talk about! He probably gets his comics history and news from, I dunno, a clickbait Newzarama Top Ten or Wizard Magazine's Twisted Toyfare Theatre or something.

So, instead of "getting into it" there... I decided that, throughout the week I'd literally "get into it"... the story, that is. There's been a lot said about it -- including some corrections/revisionism from the writer of the issue, Jim Shooter himself... some of which... I dunno, doesn't really line up. So, let's... ya know... get into it.

First, some table-setting.

Hank Pym is a multiple-time loser. I'm one'a those as well, so I'm allowed to say that. Okay -- lemme 'splain. At the time of the slap, Hank's biggest "accomplishment" was... creating Ultron. Well, Pym Particles too... but, Ultron was "fresher". He was haunted by the guilt of this... and further, being married to a woman who could seemingly spin gold out of straw (figuratively speaking), led to Hank suffering from pangs of inadequacy. Depression. Anxiety. This would lead to Hank taking multiple breaks from the superhero life, and the Avengers. I mean, he surely isn't an easy character to write... so, why not turn that negative into a positive by making his absences part of his story?

Jim Shooter, writer of the "wife-beater" issue, would say of Hank: "His history was largely a litany of failure, always changing guises and switching back and forth from research to hero-ing because he wasn't succeeding at either. He was never the Avenger who saved the day at the end and usually the first knocked out or captured. His most notable 'achievement' in the lab was creating Ultron. Meanwhile, his rich, beautiful wife succeeded in everything she tried. She was also always flitting around his shoulders, flirting, saying things to prop up his ego."

In the lead-up to the slap story, Hank was back... and was acting increasingly erratic. His bitterness took over, and he'd verbally lash out at Janet... in front of the rest of the team! Example below from Avengers #212 (October, 1981) aka. "Slap-Eve". He seems to be in a constant and painful state of struggle due to his feelings of inadequacy.

Hank tells Jan where she can stick her money and butlers
Avengers #212 (October, 1981) - (w) Jim Shooter / (a) Alan Kupperberg

Later that very same issue, this would lead to him endangering the entire squad (as well as the public) during a battle with the ElfQueen. During this brouhaha, Captain America appears to be able to get through to the ElfQueen... hopeful that he can diffuse a very dangerous situation peaceably -- when, ol' Hank goes into business for himself -- zapping the EQ in the back with one of his stingers! This completely undoes and undermines Cap's attempt at mitigating the threat.

Hank figures out his stingers... just in time to foul everything up! Avengers #212 (October, 1981) - (w) Jim Shooter / (a) Alan Kupperberg

The ElfQueen reacts to this by... dropping a truck on our man! Thankfully, his erstwhile better half was there to save his bacon. Well, thankfully in the "dude didn't get crushed by a truck" way... though, perhaps just a little bit embarrassing for our Hank.

Hank doesn't amount to a (very small) hill'a beans...
Avengers #212 (October, 1981) - (w) Jim Shooter / (a) Alan Kupperberg

Oddly, Avengers #212 includes a bit of a lead-up to the ElfQueen's attack... in a scene wherein she's... uh... slapped in the face by her husband, Gorn. Why bother bringing this up? Well, it sorta-kinda feels like something we're intended to draw parallels to, what with what's about to happen between Hank and Jan. I mean, that's my immediate takeaway. Maybe I'm wrong?

Spousal Abuse, Take One
Avengers #212 (October, 1981) - (w) Jim Shooter / (a) Alan Kupperberg

In witnessing this increasingly erratic, reckless, and dangerous behavior from Pym, that Captain America court martials him. With little time in the interim, Hank heads back to the lab in order to come up with something that may redeem him in the eyes of his fellow Avengers. What he comes up with is... well, another Adamantium Robot! It worked so well the first time, yes? Anyway, the gimmick here is that... he'd unleash this robot on the Avengers, knowing that he himself would be the only one who could defeat it. Solid plan, eh? So, Hank would save the day -- and be back in everybody's good graces. What could possibly go wrong?

What's the definition of insanity again?
Avengers #213 (November, 1981) - (w) Jim Shooter / (a) Bob Hall

Janet, worried about her frazzled husband, would investigate... and discover both the robot and Hank's plan for it. This, my friends, is where The Slap happens.

The Slap
Avengers #213 (November, 1981) - (w) Jim Shooter / (a) Bob Hall

Pretty cut and dry, yes? Hank, pushed to the limits of his sanity, lashes out and backhands poor Jan. It's not exactly "dur hur, gets drunk and beats his wife all the time", but it's pretty plain to see that this was an intentional WHAK!, yes?

Well, maybe notsomuch? Let's check in on Jim Shooter's old blog... in a post titled "Hank Pym was Not a Wife-Beater", dated March 29, 2011, Jim would blame "the slap" on a bit of lateness on his part added with a dash of miscommunication between he and artist, Bob Hall. Jim sez:

"In that story (issue 213, I think), there is a scene in which Hank is supposed to have accidentally struck Jan while throwing his hands up in despair and frustration -- making a sort of "get away from me" gesture while not looking at her. Bob Hall, who had been taught by John Buscema to always go for the most extreme action, turned that into a right cross (actually a left-handed backhand slap)! There was no time to have it redrawn, which, to this day has caused the tragic story of Hank Pym to be known as the 'wife-beater' story."

Now, as much as I wanna take Mr. Shooter at his word here... I'm struggling a bit. Let's play out his scene. Jan comes in, Hank accidentally bops her in the face -- and, then what? Like, why even include the scene at all, if you're not going to go "all the way" with it? I'm assuming Avengers #213 was created using the "Marvel Method", which is to say - plot, to pencils, to script. What do y'all think Shooter's plot said? I mean, if he can recall enough detail to know that he intended for Hank to "throw up his hands in despair and frustration", than he definitely had (a version of) this scene in mind, yes?

How does this scene add to Hank's downfall if it doesn't go the way it does? Later on in the issue, Janet removes her sunglasses... revealing the fresh black eye left on her by her husband. Hank -- doesn't show any remorse. He doesn't appear to regret his actions, nor care to do anything about making it right. In fact, he doubles-down on being a jerk!

Janet reveals her black eye
Avengers #213 (November, 1981) - (w) Jim Shooter / (a) Bob Hall

It's perhaps worth noting that the lettering in Hank's word balloons looks quite a bit different than the rest on the page... perhaps a sign of a last-minute rewrite? I suppose that somewhat supports Shooter's statements... maybe? Well, let's check in with Bob Hall, the guest-penciler of this issue and get his thoughts, from a comments thread on Bleeding Cool:

Bob Hall sez: "I never heard Jim's side of the story. He never said he didn't like the slap panel -- on the other hand, I can't imagine that he did. I would never have drawn that panel two or three years later and I certainly wouldn't draw it now the way I did then."

Regarding the Marvel Method-iness of the piece: "I have no memory of how the panel was described in the synopsis but the Marvel Method gave you a lot of lee way. What I interpreted then might have been quite different from how I would look at it now. I can't imagine Shooter would not have asked for a re-draw had there been time."

Of the panel itself: "I remember re-drawing that particular panel several times -- not for Jim but because I didn't like the results. The final panel was the point where I gave up and thought -- I know how to do Marvel Action -- I'll make it Marvel Action cause nothing else I've done seems right either."

Hall wrapped up his thoughts by corroborating Jim Shooter's take... or, at the very least, not contradicting it. He sez: "I'm not ashamed of the issue -- I did the best I could then -- but in this instance, I don't doubt Jim's story."

So, where do we end up here? Well, I'm just a regular ol' know-nothing, so all's I can go with is my gut. Personally, I think the truth, as it usually is, is somewhere in the middle. If I were a betting man (and thankfully, I am not), I'd wager that mayyybe there was to be a bit of intentional physicality involved in the scene as originally conceived -- perhaps just not to the extent that we got. The obvious (to me, anyway) rewritten dialogue in the "black eye" scene really says a lot to me in supporting Shooter's claim. The issue was drawn, there was no time for a redo... and one of the big things about Shooter's time in the big seat was... getting the books out on time. It wouldn't be a good look for his book to miss deadline, right?

So, accidental or otherwise - the damage is done, yes? The knee-jerk response to the utterance of the name "Hank Pym" will forevermore be "Wife-Beater"! You may wonder, with all the relaunches, reboots, reimaginings... all the "Everything you thought you knew... was wrong!" hoo-doo that Marvel loves to pull -- why hasn't this been "undone"?

Well... they tried... sorta. Let's hop ahead a decade and a half to one of the more notorious Avengers stories of all time... perhaps even moreso than The Slap -- we're talking The Crossing! Avengers #395 (February, 1996) reveals... in the midst of this absolute mess of a story, that Kang was responsible for all'a Hank Pym's mental breakdowns!

Avengers #395 (February, 1996) - (w) Bob Harras and/or Terry Kavanagh / (a) Mike Deodato

All's good in the hood then, yes? Well... for a minute. Jumping ahead just three years later, Avengers Forever #8 (July, 1999) reveals that this... was a lie! Nobody was responsible for Hank's mental state... besides Hank himself!

Avengers Forever #8 (July, 1999) - (w) Kurt Busiek / (a) Carlos Pacheco

There have been a number of opportunities to "make right" Hank's wrongs... Secret Invasion being the most obvious and glaring. But, for whatever reason, it's still part of Pym's story. To many out there, it's the only thing he's ever done! This defines his character to the point where, as part of Marvel's "new-reader friendly" Ultimate line... it literally was his entire character! Let's take a look at, master of subtlety-and-nuance-in-comics, Mark Millar's take in Ultimates #6 (August, 2002):

The Ultimate Slap
Ultimates #6 (August, 2002) - (w) Mark Millar / (a) Bryan Hitch

Hey, at least there was an attempt at consistency with Hank using his left hand. Here we see our man lashing out after being bothered while working. Ultimate Wasp, unlike her 616 counterpart, doesn't shrink away (no pun intended) from the confrontation. You may be thinking -- hey, that's not so bad -- it's playing up the 1981 scene for a new "grittier" generation. Oh-ho, we're not done yet... hell, we're barely getting started.

Janet bites Hank's arm, breaking the skin. Once that blood's drawn, Pym sees red and ups his level of violence. Jan does shrink down to escape being pinned against the desk... at which point. Oh boy, Hank grabs a can of bug spray. Is this parody? It's reading like parody.

No, it's not parody... well, not intentional parody. Hank Pym is indeed unloading a can of toxic spray all over his wife. Laughing while he does so! Comparing its burn to that of napalm! And, well... we're still not done yet.

Our hero then sics an army of ants on her. In fairness, he does seem remorseful at the end of the issue... but, at that point, we're go gobsmacked and befuddled by what we just saw, that I don't know that it even matters. Born of a miscommunication, and whether anybody likes it or not -- this is Hank Pym. To entire generations of comic book fans, this is who... or, what he is.

In putting this piece together, I find myself... almost understanding where that goober at the comic shop was coming from, when he mentioned Pym "dur hur, getting drunk and beating his wife all the time"... well, not the "getting drunk" bit, perhaps he was conflating that with that trait Tony Stark can never seem to escape. But, in the spousal abuse... I kinda get it. This is the Hank Pym Marvel wants us to see... it's the only one they're going to let us see. I'm, of course, talking comics only -- I don't watch the movies, you know that. Never seen a single "MCU" movie, in fact!

I honestly didn't see myself coming away from this piece feeling this way.

Before we cut out, just one more bit from Shooter's Blog to corroborate his take. He sez: "When that issue came out, Bill Sienkiewicz came to me upset that I hadn't asked him to draw it! He saw the intent through Hall's mistake, and was moved enough by the story to wish he'd had the chance to do it properly."

This is interesting, as I often wonder how the "creative" mind works... how folks "on the inside" see the same panels we do... while "receiving" them in a completely different way. You and I look at "The Slap", and it -- is what it is, yes? Hank slapped Jan in a fit of frustration. It didn't appear to be an accident or mistake -- just a lapse in his sanity. A pro like Sienkiewicz sees it... differently. To the point where he wished it were him who drew the thing! I'm not a fan of interviewing comics pros, but I do like getting a bit of insight as to their points of view on the "language" and "craft".

To wrap things up, Mr. Sienkiewicz did finally get his chance to be part of a "backhand" scene! Let's hop over to the Clone Saga (wow, The Crossing and the Clone Saga in the same piece? Hatchi-matchi!). In Spectacular Spider-Man #226 (July, 1995), it was revealed that the Peter Parker we'd been following since the original clone story... was, in fact, the clone! This Ben Reilly guy was the real deal! Upon finding out, Peter reacts in... well, a very Pymian way.

The... less talked about Slap
Spectacular Spider-Man #226 (July, 1995) - (w) Tom DeFalco / (a) Sal Buscema (inks - Bill Sienkiewicz)

Driven to the point where be briefly loses touch with his sanity, Peter Parker... who, has the proportionate strength of a spider... backhands his... err, pregnant wife -- sending her flying across the room, where she slams into a void of speed lines and debris! So, I guess the next time they announce yet another Spider-Man film reboot... you can tell the chap who owns your local comic shop that you hope they use the one that "dur hur, gets drunk and beats his wife all the time"?

Or, maybe not. Thanks for reading.

Sunday, April 24, 2022

Weird Comics History - Sue's Coiffure Contest

 

Weird Comics History - That Time the Invisible Woman Got a Mullet

Fantastic Four #258 (September, 1983) - Fantastic Four #287 (February, 1986)
A Saga by John Byrne with a little help from his fans

Here's something a little bit different for your Sunday -- dusting off the ol' Weird Comics History brand, and chatting up a bit of... well, weird comics history. It's nothing Earth-shattering, and you probably won't actually learn anything today -- but, I thought it would be fun to pop in on a happening from the early-mid 1980s that -- does get a bit of chatter, but that chatter is more about the destination than the journey.

There are some notable instances in comics history in which the fans of the funnybooks get a "say" (or at least the perception of a say) as to certain story beats, team makeups, or what have you. Sometimes these decisions leave a long-lasting impact... other times, it's barely a blip. This one transcends all'a that. This is bigger than any "comic book story". This is an event which actually changed society as a whole. Now, you can keep your Jason Todd 900 numbers, and your Hellfire Gala X-Men Votes -- because this, my friends, is far more important than any of that. This is all about the time the comic fans held the very fate of Sue Richards...'s hair in their hands.

But first, a little backstory. As I've said time and again, my first exposure to many of the (non-X) Marvel Superheroes was via the Marvel Universe trading card sets. Back in the long ago, I never saw myself as a "Marvel Fan" -- I was an X-Men fan. Didn't have time for the Avengers, Fantastic Four... heck, I'd only pop in on Spidey every now and again. So, all of my (vast) Marvel knowledge came from what was written on the back of these cards. And, since these facts were among the first things I learned... well, I think my brain kinda prioritized them as being the most important bits... even to this very day!

Let's take a look at the Invisible Woman's card from Marvel Universe, Series I (1990):

The "Didja Know" boxes on the bottom of these cards included some of the neatest information -- nothing all that important, but something different than the usual "Name/Rank/Serial Number". Looking at Sue's, hers is all about how she changes up her hairstyle pretty often. At the time, I didn't have much of a frame of reference to back that up. I only knew the Sue who was currently on the racks. I certainly wasn't dipping into the back-issue bins for old issues of Fantastic Four -- what do I look like, some sort of comic book fan?! It was just a bit of info that I dumped into my mental archives, and never really thought of again.

Fast-forward to a handful of years later, and Heroes Return was the big thing in comics. I'll admit, I got sucked in -- and, for the most part, I stuck. Curiosity, too much disposable income, as well as too little common sense and self control led to me, for the first time ever, regularly buying books outside the X-Line. And, being something of a rabid completionist, I started dipping my toe into the back issue bins... looking for "classics" (ie. 80s-90s books that wouldn't cost me an arm and a leg) to add to my collection. This was just barely post-boom -- 1997 or so, when the back-issue bins were still the home of books that'd put you thru college and pay off your mortgage. What I'm trying to say here is, they were still demanding decently high prices.

Though, there were books that appeared to be immune. Books like Excalibur, Alpha Flight, and... Fantastic Four. I'm sure there were others, but -- these three were among those on my "backfill list", so they stand out. I began to amass quite an impressive (to me, anyway) collection of FF... going all the way back to the, sorta-kinda mythical Byrne run. As a young comics enthusiast in the early 90s, I'd hear tell of the "glory days" of the 80s. Walt Simonson's Thor, Chris Claremont on X-Men (duh), Mark Gruenwald on Cap... and, of course, John Byrne's Fantastic Four. Any time I was able to grab an ish... any ish... from one of these runs, I felt as though I was holding a piece of history. Yes, I do tend to overromanticize things... why do you ask?

It was an especially great day when I happened into the very first issue of the Byrne FF run. It was in a dollar bin, of all places... and, I guess it's safe to say that the back-issue bonanza "worm" had turned. Shops, at least those in my neck of the woods, were in what felt like "liquidation mode", just get 'em gone. A great time for collectors like me... but, maybe not the greatest sign in the strength of the industry (and the retailer arm of).

Now, I say all of that - so I might say this. Cracking open that first Byrne issue, which I have covered here on the site -- in the then-novel (for me) and inaugural "Marvel May" article, in 2020. Within the first few pages, we see Sue Storm getting her hair done at a fru-fru salon. Here's a snip (no pun intended) from that piece:

Fantastic Four #232 (1981) - (w/a) John Byrne

When I wrote about this issue, I commented that this was a "very Byrne-y scene" to include... and we'll talk more about that in just a bit. First though, it was in seeing this scene that I recalled that silly li'l "Didja Know?" box on the trading card. And, being the more "seasoned" comics enthusiast that I was at the time, I suddenly realized that -- yeah, Sue does change her look an awful lot. More so than most comic book characters (well, intentionally anyway -- we're not talking editorial oversight or lack of artist consistency here). I can appreciate that as a character beat... and, as such, I enjoy seeing scenes like this play out on-panel -- or, at the very least, get mentioned on-panel. I'm also a very big fan of the concept of "style sheets", as in -- if you're drawing such-and-such book, here's what the character(s) LOOK LIKE. Nowadays, there are certain characters who's "look" can't stay consistent from panel to panel, much less issue to issue -- I'll spare y'all the cute "*cough*" sound effect, and just say - Carol Danvers.

To explain my "very Byrne-y scene" comment -- well, being a fella who often gets lost in the weeds of the comics hobby... and, tries to look for patterns... or really anything "noteworthy" that I might be able to dig into and discuss, I couldn't help but notice that JB has had some of female cast members drastically change their looks when he hopped onto a title/franchise. Here are just a couple of the noteworthiest examples (in my opinion):

Despite looking like they could be twin-sisters, or - ya know, the same person -- this is Lois Lane and the Scarlet Witch. I suppose we might say they've got "RBF"... Resting Byrne Face. And, hey, I love JB's work -- but, even Marvel has acknowledged RBF.

Marvel: Year in Review 1991

Where was I? Oh yeah, John Byrne designing "new looks" for characters under his purview. I may be projecting, but his adherence to and appreciation for how certain characters are supposed to look really comes through in his work. If he makes a change to attempt to update them to current-year, or if the character faces some sort of internal crisis -- those changes feel organic. A character like Sue Storm... who, as the trading card said, often changes up how she looks, doesn't really need much reason.

However, since that is part of her character -- mebbe JB can have a bit of fun shaking up her look a bit. Mebbe he might even reach out to the readership to get some of their thoughts on how Sue oughta be brought into the mid-80s? Enter: Sue's Coiffure Contest. In the Fantastic Four Fan Page (Letters Page) from Fantastic Four #258 (September, 1983), Byrne makes the following announcement:

Fantastic Four #258 (September, 1983)

FF #258 also includes that scene where it's revealed that the Dr. Doom who Arcade lit a match on over in Uncanny X-Men #146 (June, 1981) was a Doombot. So, the Coiffure Contest and JB being a bit precious! In retrospect, this is a far more important issue than I initially thought -- I'd better slab the thing ASAP! Anyway, I guess that goofy haircut Milo gave her during Byrne's "Back to Basics" wasn't one of her faves. It's worth noting, at this point in the comic, Sue's taken to wearing a "very unglamorous" brown wig, as part of an attempt at having a secret identity (Susan Benjamin). Hmm, if Sue thinks that look is unglamorous... well, just you wait!

Fantastic Four #259 (October, 1983) - (w/a) John Byrne

It's worth noting here, that Sue "Benjamin" Storm was pregnant with her and Reed's second child at this point -- and, there were rumblings in the letters pages (and in the comics themselves) that she was about to undergo some sort of "coming of age" -- shedding the Invisible Girl name, becoming the Invisible Woman (though, the Letters Pages seemed more keen on her going by "Mrs. Fantastic"). Speaking of "changes", hatchi matchi... here's a look at the Fantastic Four Fan Page from FF #263 (February, 1984):

Fantastic Four #263 (February, 1984)

It's announced here that, within the first few months of this contest, Marvel has received 528 entries! Good grief -- though, it's worth noting that a grip of those entries were requesting that Sue revisit some looks from the past. We get some "honorable mentions" listed here -- which, if I were a real comics historian, and not just a fake-ass one, I'd have probably made some effort to tracking down some of these folks for comment.

Some of the parameters of the contest are better laid out here -- the winning style has to be: a) practical, b) attractive, c) suitable to Sue, and d) not too painful to have to draw a few dozen times per issue. Well, I'm guessing this disqualifies like nine outta every ten entries right there! John Byrne does take the time to render a couple of the suggested looks here -- these are apparently the two that have gotten the most votes. They're not going to win, for a variety of reasons -- but, the people have spoken -- further proving that old Stan Lee quote "Don't ever give the fans what they think they want" true. I can actually see Sue wearing the look on the left -- though, it does look like it'd be a pain in the ass to draw. The mohawk though? C'mahhhhn. I'm sure JB had fun with this though.

Issue #263 was the official END of the contest -- as in, quit sending us yer stuff.

Fantastic Four #266 (May, 1984) sees Sue hanging out at the wig shop -- looking for a more glamorous hair-hat. Worth noting, that her own hair looks a lot different than it has in these last several issues -- so, you might've assumed that this scene right here was the "big reveal" of the Coiffure Contest Winner! But... no such luck, Chuck. This is just a stop-gap hairdo on our way to something so tragic that FEMA may have to be called in.

Here's a look at Sue from Fantastic Four #268 (July, 1984) -- a storyline that is much more important than the silly Coiffure Contest -- however, since we're talking about the silly Coiffure Contest, I gotta show it. Um, what was that I was saying about Byrne being consistent with character appearances? This is literally the third hairstyle Sue's had... in as many issues. Ehh, let's just blame Secret Wars. Yeah, I know she wasn't there... but, we'll blame it anyway.

Fantastic Four #268 (July, 1984) - (w/a) John Byrne

The following issue features Sue with some very long hair... the lengths of which I don't think we've ever seen her wear.

Fantastic Four #269 (August, 1984) - (w/a) John Byrne

This issue, Fantastic Four #269 (August, 1984) is also very notable for our contest... as, the WINNER is announced! Well, sorta. Ya see, whoever sent in this winning style... neglected to include a note with their drawing! And, I mean... in hindsight... I guess it'd make sense that nobody would wanna take credit for this thing. Well, "clear" credit anyway -- the did sign the piece... and, as far as Marvel can make out they've got a last name of Mayes... and a first name of... well, somethin'. Their best guesses are Tyron, Byron, or just-plain Ron. So, if you're reading this Mr. (or Ms.) Mayes -- reach out. That is, of course, if Ty-By-Ron Mayes isn't just another name for John Byrne. From the Fan Page:

Fantastic Four #269 (August, 1984)

So, you might be wondering... how long are we going to have to wait in order to SEE the winning Coiffure? Well, just a couple of issues, actually. Fantastic Four #271 (October, 1984) opens with the gut-punch that is... Sue's Mullet.

Fantastic Four #271 (October, 1984) - (w/a) John Byrne

Happy Birthday, indeed. Gotta wonder if JB used Florence Henderson as a point of reference for this one... Sue's lookin' very Carol Brady here.

Sue's bad decision isn't the only notable bit about this issue -- it also marks the shift in the letters page from the Fantastic Four Fan Page to the Fantastic Forum. The letters page has been busily taking JB to task for murdering characters left and right... and thus, Byrne challenged the readership to send in their thoughts on who they would kill (in the book, natch) if they could. Apparently this got quite the response... however, not near as many replies as the Coiffure Contest!

Fantastic Four #271 (October, 1984)

Now, for such a popular and engaging contest, you'd assume that the letters pages for the next several issues might be full of reactions to this dramatic change in appearance for Sue, right? Well... notsomuch. This change of appearance isn't even commented on once in the Fantastic Forum... and heck, far as I can tell, Reed doesn't even compliment her on her new look. I mean, this might be a case of "If you have nothing nice to say..." but still. Weird that something that had a bit of pomp and circumstance doesn't get any play on-panel.

So, how long was Sue bemulleted anyway? It's funny, looking back, memory being what it is, it feels like the Sue-mullet era lasted for like... several years. It wasn't quite that long, however... though it was around for some pretty memorable little ditties, like the time Sue became the Hatemonger's sidekick-of-sorts, Malice.

Fantastic Four #280 (July, 1985) - (w/a) John Byrne

Which also gave us this little sequence...

Fantastic Four #261 (August, 1985) - (w/a) John Byrne

It was also while mulleted that Sue changed her name from Invisible Girl to Invisible Woman.

Fantastic Four #284 (November, 1985) - (w/a) John Byrne

Sue was mud-flapped during the Return of Jean Grey!

Fantastic Four #286 (January, 1986) - (w/a) You Know Who

And, in the very next issue -- in a "very Byrne-y scene", Sue finally gets turned back into a normal human - on-panel.

Fantastic Four #287 (February, 1986) - (w/a) John Byrne

Sue's Mullet: Fantastic Four #271 (October, 1984) - Fantastic Four #287 (February, 1986). Sixteen months of style -- and probably one of the sillier things I've spent any amount of time researching and writing about. If you're still reading at this point, I humbly thank you for joining me on this odd little adventure.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...